A comparative evaluation of machine learning methods for robot navigation through human crowds
Anastasia Gaydashenko, Daniel Kudenko, Aleksei Shpilman

TL;DR
This paper compares traditional pathfinding and prediction methods with reinforcement learning for robot navigation in crowds, demonstrating reinforcement learning's superior performance in safety and efficiency.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparative evaluation of these approaches on real-world crowd data, highlighting the advantages of reinforcement learning.
Findings
Reinforcement learning outperforms pathfinding and prediction methods.
Reinforcement learning achieves faster and safer navigation.
State-of-the-art reinforcement learning methods are most effective.
Abstract
Robot navigation through crowds poses a difficult challenge to AI systems, since the methods should result in fast and efficient movement but at the same time are not allowed to compromise safety. Most approaches to date were focused on the combination of pathfinding algorithms with machine learning for pedestrian walking prediction. More recently, reinforcement learning techniques have been proposed in the research literature. In this paper, we perform a comparative evaluation of pathfinding/prediction and reinforcement learning approaches on a crowd movement dataset collected from surveillance videos taken at Grand Central Station in New York. The results demonstrate the strong superiority of state-of-the-art reinforcement learning approaches over pathfinding with state-of-the-art behaviour prediction techniques.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
