TL;DR
This paper develops formal models of indecision in preference modeling, integrating insights from philosophy, psychology, and economics, to improve AI decision-making in morally sensitive contexts.
Contribution
It introduces new mathematical indecision models that account for nuanced indecisiveness, addressing limitations of previous preference aggregation techniques.
Findings
Models successfully describe indecisive agent behavior
Data from survey supports the validity of the models
Enhances preference learning accuracy in moral decision contexts
Abstract
AI systems are often used to make or contribute to important decisions in a growing range of applications, including criminal justice, hiring, and medicine. Since these decisions impact human lives, it is important that the AI systems act in ways which align with human values. Techniques for preference modeling and social choice help researchers learn and aggregate peoples' preferences, which are used to guide AI behavior; thus, it is imperative that these learned preferences are accurate. These techniques often assume that people are willing to express strict preferences over alternatives; which is not true in practice. People are often indecisive, and especially so when their decision has moral implications. The philosophy and psychology literature shows that indecision is a measurable and nuanced behavior -- and that there are several different reasons people are indecisive. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
