Evidence against the Efimov effect in $^{12}\mathrm{C}$ from spectroscopy and astrophysics
J. Bishop, G.V. Rogachev, S. Ahn, E. Aboud, M. Barbui, A. Bosh, J., Hooker, C. Hunt, J. Hooker, H. Jayatissa, E. Koshchiy, R. Malecek, S.T., Marley, M. Munch, E.C. Pollaco, C.D. Pruitt, B.T. Roeder, A. Saastamoinen,, L.G. Sobotka, S. Upadhyayula

TL;DR
This study uses spectroscopy and astrophysical data to test for the existence of an Efimov state in carbon-12 at 7.458 MeV, finding no evidence for such a state and challenging its hypothesized properties.
Contribution
The paper provides the first experimental constraints on the Efimov state in $^{12}$C, combining decay spectroscopy and astrophysical reaction rate calculations to disprove its existence at the proposed energy.
Findings
No evidence of the Efimov state at 7.458 MeV in $^{12}$C.
The Efimov state cannot have a gamma-decay branching ratio above 0.7%.
Including such a state in models increases the triple-alpha reaction rate beyond stellar requirements.
Abstract
Background: The Efimov effect is a universal phenomenon in physics whereby three-body systems are stabilized via the interaction of an unbound two-body sub-systems. A hypothetical state in at 7.458 MeV excitation energy, comprising of a loose structure of three -particles in mutual two-body resonance, has been suggested in the literature to correspond to an Efimov state in nuclear physics. The existence of such a state has not been demonstrated experimentally. Method: Using the combined data sets from two recent experiments, one with the TexAT TPC to measure -decay and the other with Gammasphere to measure -decay of states in populated by and -decay respectively, we achieve high sensitivity to states in close-proximity to the -threshold in . Results: No…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
