TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel framework where both agents and zero-sum games evolve strategically over time, revealing regularities like conservation laws, recurrence, and convergence to Nash equilibrium despite chaotic coevolution.
Contribution
It develops a comprehensive theoretical analysis of coevolving agents and games, demonstrating regularities and providing an efficient algorithm for predicting long-term behavior.
Findings
System exhibits information-theoretic conservation laws
System is Poincaré recurrent with recurrent orbits
Time-average behavior converges to Nash equilibrium
Abstract
The predominant paradigm in evolutionary game theory and more generally online learning in games is based on a clear distinction between a population of dynamic agents that interact given a fixed, static game. In this paper, we move away from the artificial divide between dynamic agents and static games, to introduce and analyze a large class of competitive settings where both the agents and the games they play evolve strategically over time. We focus on arguably the most archetypal game-theoretic setting -- zero-sum games (as well as network generalizations) -- and the most studied evolutionary learning dynamic -- replicator, the continuous-time analogue of multiplicative weights. Populations of agents compete against each other in a zero-sum competition that itself evolves adversarially to the current population mixture. Remarkably, despite the chaotic coevolution of agents and games,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
