Further evidence for the non-existence of a unified hoop conjecture
Shahar Hod

TL;DR
This paper investigates the hoop conjecture's applicability to black holes and horizonless objects, providing evidence that a unified conjecture valid for both types does not exist, based on analysis of Kerr-Newman black holes.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that when using quasilocal mass definitions, Kerr-Newman black holes do not satisfy a unified hoop conjecture with horizonless objects, suggesting such a universal formulation is unlikely.
Findings
Kerr-Newman black holes have a sub-critical mass-to-circumference ratio when using quasilocal mass.
Evidence suggests no single hoop conjecture applies to both black holes and horizonless objects.
The results challenge the possibility of a unified hoop conjecture for all compact objects.
Abstract
The hoop conjecture, introduced by Thorne almost five decades ago, asserts that black holes are characterized by the mass-to-circumference relation , whereas horizonless compact objects are characterized by the opposite inequality (here is the circumference of the smallest ring that can engulf the self-gravitating compact object in all azimuthal directions). It has recently been proved that a necessary condition for the validity of this conjecture in horizonless spacetimes of spatially regular charged compact objects is that the mass be interpreted as the mass contained within the engulfing sphere (and not as the asymptotically measured total ADM mass). In the present paper we raise the following physically intriguing question: Is it possible to formulate a unified version of the hoop conjecture which is valid…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
