Monoidal Categories for Formal Concept Analysis
Sean Tull

TL;DR
This paper explores monoidal categories in formal concept analysis, revealing new structures and their potential for compositional models of meaning, linking formal contexts with lattice theory.
Contribution
It introduces a second monoidal structure on categories of formal contexts, connecting formal concept analysis with monoidal category theory and compositional semantics.
Findings
Existence of a second monoidal structure on categories of formal contexts
Equivalence between bonds/Chu correspondences and *-autonomous categories
Potential application in compositional models of meaning
Abstract
We investigate monoidal categories of formal contexts, in which states correspond to formal concepts. In particular we examine the category of bonds or Chu correspondences between contexts, which is known to be equivalent to the *-autonomous category of complete sup-lattices. We show that a second monoidal structure exists on both categories, corresponding to the direct product of formal contexts defined by Ganter and Wille, and discuss the use of these categories as compositional models of meaning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Semantic Web and Ontologies
