New Evidence for Extended HeII Reionization at z>3.5 from HeII Lyman Alpha and Beta Transmission Spikes
Kirill Makan (1), G\'abor Worseck (1), Frederick B. Davies (2), Joseph, F. Hennawi (3), J. Xavier Prochaska (4), Philipp Richter (1) ((1), Universit\"at Potsdam, (2) Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie, (3), University of California Santa Barbara

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution HST spectra of two quasars to detect isolated HeII transmission spikes at z>3.5, providing evidence that HeII reionization was significantly advanced by this epoch.
Contribution
First high-resolution spectra of two quasars at z>3.5 revealing HeII transmission spikes, constraining the timing and progression of HeII reionization.
Findings
Detection of isolated HeII Lyα and Lyβ transmission spikes at z>3.5
Estimated HeII photoionization rates around 10^{-15} s^{-1}
Evidence that HeII reionization was substantially progressed at z>3.5
Abstract
We present new high-resolution (R~14,000) spectra of the two brightest HeII-transparent quasars in the far-UV (FUV) at z>3.5, HE2QSJ2311-1417 (z=3.70) and HE2QSJ1630+0435 (z=3.81), obtained with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). In the predominantly saturated HeII absorption spectra, both sightlines show several isolated resolved (full width at half maximum FWHM>50 km/s) transmission spikes in HeII Ly and HeII Ly. The incidence of such spikes decreases with increasing redshift, but both sightlines show significant spikes at z>3.5, signaling the presence of fully ionized regions in the z>3.5 intergalactic medium (IGM). We employ an automated algorithm to compare the number of detected HeII transmission spikes to predictions from mock spectra created from the outputs of a cubic (100/h cMpc)^3 optically thin Nyx hydrodynamical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
