Pushing automated morphological classifications to their limits with the Dark Energy Survey
J. Vega-Ferrero, H. Dom\'inguez S\'anchez, M. Bernardi, M., Huertas-Company, R. Morgan, B. Margalef, M. Aguena, S. Allam, J. Annis, S., Avila, D. Bacon, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind,, J. Carretero, A. Choi, C. Conselice, M. Costanzi, L. N. da Costa

TL;DR
This paper presents a deep learning approach to classify approximately 27 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey, achieving high accuracy and creating the largest automated galaxy morphology catalog to date.
Contribution
It introduces a CNN-based classification method trained on brighter galaxies and applied to fainter ones, significantly expanding automated galaxy morphology data.
Findings
97% accuracy on training set for galaxies brighter than magnitude 21.5
Secure classifications for about 87% of the catalog for ETG vs. LTG
High correlation with traditional morphological indicators like Sersic index and ellipticity
Abstract
We present morphological classifications of 27 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Data Release 1 (DR1) using a supervised deep learning algorithm. The classification scheme separates: (a) early-type galaxies (ETGs) from late-types (LTGs); and (b) face-on galaxies from edge-on. Our Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are trained on a small subset of DES objects with previously known classifications. These typically have ; we model fainter objects to mag by simulating what the brighter objects with well determined classifications would look like if they were at higher redshifts. The CNNs reach 97\% accuracy to on their training sets, suggesting that they are able to recover features more accurately than the human eye. We then used the trained CNNs to classify the vast majority of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
