Intercomparison of Monte Carlo calculated dose enhancement ratios for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays: assessing the uncertainty and correct methodology for extended beams
H. Rabus, W.B. Li, C. Villagrasa, J. Schuemann, P.A. Hepperle, L. de, la Fuente Rosales, M. Beuve, S. Di Maria, A.P. Klapproth, C.Y. Li, F., Poignant, B. Rudek, H. Nettelbeck

TL;DR
This paper compares Monte Carlo simulation results for gold nanoparticle dose enhancement under X-ray irradiation, emphasizing the importance of realistic radiation field modeling and methodology correction for accurate dose estimates.
Contribution
It introduces a methodology to correct and interpret Monte Carlo DER results, clarifying the actual dose enhancement in realistic irradiation conditions.
Findings
DERs are significantly smaller under realistic conditions compared to narrow-beam simulations.
Dose enhancement is confined within a few hundred nanometers of GNP surface.
A methodology for correcting simulation deviations was developed and applied.
Abstract
Results of a Monte Carlo code intercomparison exercise for simulations of the dose enhancement from a gold nanoparticle (GNP) irradiated by X-rays have been recently reported. To highlight potential differences between codes, the dose enhancement ratios (DERs) were shown for the narrow-beam geometry used in the simulations, which leads to values significantly higher than unity over distances in the order of several tens of micrometers from the GNP surface. As it has come to our attention that the figures in our paper have given rise to misinterpretation as showing 'the' DERs of GNPs under diagnostic X-ray irradiation, this article presents estimates of the DERs that would have been obtained with realistic radiation field extensions and presence of secondary particle equilibrium (SPE). These DER values are much smaller than those for a narrow-beam irradiation shown in our paper, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
