MICROSCOPE mission analysis, requirements and expected performance
Pierre Touboul, Manuel Rodrigues, Gilles M\'etris, Ratana Chhun, Alain, Robert, Quentin Baghi, Emilie Hardy, Joel Berg\'e, Damien Boulanger, Bruno, Christophe, Valerio Cipolla, Bernard Foulon, Pierre-Yves Guidotti, Phuong-Anh, Huynh, Vincent Lebat, Fran\c{c}oise Liorzou

TL;DR
The MICROSCOPE mission aims to test the Weak Equivalence Principle with unprecedented precision by measuring differential accelerations of test masses in orbit, detailing system requirements, error analysis, and expected performance.
Contribution
This paper presents the detailed analysis, system specifications, and error budget for the MICROSCOPE mission's goal to test the WEP at a precision of 10^{-15}.
Findings
Mission design achieves the targeted measurement precision.
Error budget analysis identifies dominant systematic uncertainties.
Expected performance meets the mission's scientific objectives.
Abstract
The MICROSCOPE mission aimed to test the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) to a precision of . The WEP states that two bodies fall at the same rate on a gravitational field independently of their mass or composition. In MICROSCOPE, two masses of different compositions (titanium and platinum alloys) are placed on a quasi-circular trajectory around the Earth. They are the test-masses of a double accelerometer. The measurement of their accelerations is used to extract a potential WEP violation that would occur at a frequency defined by the motion and attitude of the satellite around the Earth. This paper details the major drivers of the mission leading to the specification of the major subsystems (satellite, ground segment, instrument, orbit...). Building upon the measurement equation, we derive the objective of the test in statistical and systematic error allocation and provide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
