Quantum supremacy and quantum phase transitions
Supanut Thanasilp, Jirawat Tangpanitanon, Marc-Antoine Lemonde, Ninnat, Dangniam, Dimitris G. Angelakis

TL;DR
This paper extends quantum supremacy concepts to analyze dynamical quantum phase transitions in driven many-body systems, linking complexity theory with quantum phases of matter.
Contribution
It introduces a method to use quantum supremacy signatures as order parameters for dynamical phase transitions in analog many-body systems.
Findings
Successfully captures phase transitions in a driven disordered 1D Ising model.
Identifies quantum supremacy signatures as effective indicators of phase boundaries.
Links quantum complexity measures with physical quantum phases.
Abstract
Demonstrating the ability of existing quantum platforms to perform certain computational tasks intractable to classical computers represents a cornerstone in quantum computing. Despite the growing number of such proposed "quantum supreme" tasks, it remains an important challenge to identify their direct applications. In this work, we describe how the approach proposed in Ref. [arXiv:2002.11946] for demonstrating quantum supremacy in generic driven analog many-body systems, such as those found in cold atom and ion setups, can be extended to explore dynamical quantum phase transitions. We show how key quantum supremacy signatures, such as the distance between the output distribution and the expected Porter Thomas distribution at the supremacy regime, can be used as effective order parameters. We apply this approach to a periodically driven disordered 1D Ising model and show that we can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
