TL;DR
This paper investigates the occurrence of double-descent phenomena in system identification, showing that models can improve in performance even after perfectly fitting training data, challenging traditional model complexity trade-offs.
Contribution
It demonstrates experimentally that double-descent behavior occurs in dynamic system modeling, extending the understanding of model complexity effects beyond static machine learning tasks.
Findings
Double-descent observed in system identification models.
Performance improves beyond interpolation threshold.
Validates phenomena on real-world and synthetic data.
Abstract
System identification aims to build models of dynamical systems from data. Traditionally, choosing the model requires the designer to balance between two goals of conflicting nature; the model must be rich enough to capture the system dynamics, but not so flexible that it learns spurious random effects from the dataset. It is typically observed that the model validation performance follows a U-shaped curve as the model complexity increases. Recent developments in machine learning and statistics, however, have observed situations where a "double-descent" curve subsumes this U-shaped model-performance curve. With a second decrease in performance occurring beyond the point where the model has reached the capacity of interpolating - i.e., (near) perfectly fitting - the training data. To the best of our knowledge, such phenomena have not been studied within the context of dynamic systems.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
