The Fundamental Plane of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at z~2
Mikkel Stockmann, Inger J{\o}rgensen, Sune Toft, Christopher J., Conselice, Andreas Faisst, Berta Margalef-Bentabol, Anna Gallazzi, Stefano, Zibetti, Gabriel B. Brammer, Carlos G\'omez-Guijarro, Michaela Hirschmann,, Claudia D. Lagos, Francesco M. Valentino, and Johannes Zabl

TL;DR
This study investigates the Fundamental Plane and mass-to-light ratio scaling relations of massive quiescent galaxies at redshifts 1.5 to 2.5, revealing that the most massive ones require structural evolution beyond passive aging to match local galaxy relations.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of the FP and M/L relations for a large sample of high-redshift quiescent galaxies, highlighting the need for structural evolution in the most massive cases.
Findings
Most massive galaxies at z>2 cannot passively evolve to local relations.
Minor mergers and structural evolution are necessary for these galaxies.
Passive stellar aging explains the evolution of less massive galaxies.
Abstract
We examine the Fundamental Plane (FP) and mass-to-light ratio () scaling relations using the largest sample of massive quiescent galaxies at to date. The FP () is established using quiescent galaxies from COSMOS with rest-frame optical sizes and X-shooter absorption line measured stellar velocity dispersions. For a very massive, , subset of 8 quiescent galaxies at , from Stockmann et al. (2020), we show that they cannot passively evolve to the local Coma cluster relation alone and must undergo significant structural evolution to mimic the sizes of local massive galaxies. The evolution of the FP and scaling relations, from to present-day, for this subset are consistent with passive aging of the stellar population and minor merger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
