Binning is Sinning (Supernova Version): The Impact of Self-Calibration in Cosmological Analyses with Type Ia Supernovae
Dillon Brout, Samuel Hinton, and Daniel Scolnic

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that unbinned, unsmoothed covariance matrices significantly improve the self-calibration of systematic uncertainties in Type Ia Supernova cosmological analyses, especially with large datasets from upcoming surveys.
Contribution
It introduces a self-calibration approach that matches covariance-matrix methods, showing that avoiding binning and smoothing enhances systematic error reduction.
Findings
Unbinned covariance matrices reduce systematic uncertainties by ~1.5×.
Self-calibration effectiveness increases with dataset size.
Binning and smoothing hinder the self-calibration process.
Abstract
Recent cosmological analyses (e.g., JLA, Pantheon) of Type Ia Supernova (SNIa) have propagated systematic uncertainties into a covariance matrix and either binned or smoothed the systematic vectors in redshift space. We demonstrate that systematic error budgets of these analyses can be improved by a factor of with the use of unbinned and unsmoothed covariance matrices. To understand this, we employ a separate approach that simultaneously fits for cosmological parameters and additional self-calibrating scale parameters that constrain the size of each systematic. We show that the covariance-matrix approach and scale-parameter approach yield equivalent results, implying that in both cases the data can self-calibrate certain systematic uncertainties, but that this ability is hindered when information is binned or smoothed in redshift space. We review the top systematic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
