Estimating distances from parallaxes. V: Geometric and photogeometric distances to 1.47 billion stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3
C. A. L. Bailer-Jones (1), J. Rybizki (1), M. Fouesneau (1), M., Demleitner (2), R. Andrae (1) ((1) Max Planck Institute for Astronomy,, Heidelberg, (2) Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Heidelberg)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a probabilistic method for estimating stellar distances using Gaia EDR3 data, improving accuracy especially for stars with large parallax uncertainties by incorporating a Galactic model and star properties.
Contribution
It presents a novel probabilistic approach combining geometric and photogeometric methods to estimate stellar distances from Gaia data, accounting for Galactic structure and extinction.
Findings
Photogeometric distances are more accurate for stars with poor parallaxes.
The catalogue includes 1.47 billion geometric and 1.35 billion photogeometric distances.
The method provides uncertainty measures as quantiles of a posterior distribution.
Abstract
Stellar distances constitute a foundational pillar of astrophysics. The publication of 1.47 billion stellar parallaxes from Gaia is a major contribution to this. Yet despite Gaia's precision, the majority of these stars are so distant or faint that their fractional parallax uncertainties are large, thereby precluding a simple inversion of parallax to provide a distance. Here we take a probabilistic approach to estimating stellar distances that uses a prior constructed from a three-dimensional model of our Galaxy. This model includes interstellar extinction and Gaia's variable magnitude limit. We infer two types of distance. The first, geometric, uses the parallax together with a direction-dependent prior on distance. The second, photogeometric, additionally uses the colour and apparent magnitude of a star, by exploiting the fact that stars of a given colour have a restricted range of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
