Generation of sub-MHz and spectrally-bright biphotons from hot atomic vapors with a phase mismatch-free scheme
Chia-Yu Hsu, Yu-Sheng Wang, Jia-Mou Chen, Fu-Chen Huang, Yi-Ting Ke,, Emily Kay Huang, Weilun Hung, Kai-Lin Chao, Shih-Si Hsiao, Yi-Hsin Chen,, Chih-Sung Chuu, Ying-Cheng Chen, Yong-Fan Chen, and Ite A. Yu

TL;DR
This paper presents a phase mismatch-free scheme for generating high-purity, spectrally-bright biphotons from hot atomic vapors with tunable sub-MHz linewidths, outperforming previous hot-atom sources and rivaling cold-atom and cavity-based methods.
Contribution
The authors introduce an all-copropagating, phase-mismatch-free scheme for biphoton generation in hot vapors, achieving record brightness and narrow linewidths.
Findings
Maximum $g_{s,as}^{(2)}$ of 42 at 610 kHz linewidth
Generation rate per linewidth of 1,500 pairs/(s·MHz)
Narrowest linewidth of 290±20 kHz among single-mode biphotons
Abstract
We utilized the all-copropagating scheme, which maintains the phase-match condition, in the spontaneous four-wave mixing (SFWM) process to generate biphotons from a hot atomic vapor. The scheme enables our biphotons not only to surpass those in the previous works of hot-atom SFWM, but also to compete with the biphotons that are generated by either the cold-atom SFWM or the cavity-assisted spontaneous parametric down conversion. The biphoton linewidth in this work is tunable for an order of magnitude. As we tuned the linewidth to 610 kHz, the maximum two-photon correlation function, , of the biphotons is 42. This violates the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality for classical light by 440 folds, and demonstrates that the biphotons have a high purity. The generation rate per linewidth of the 610-kHz biphoton source is 1,500 pairs/(sMHz), which is the best…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
