Assessing the projection correction of Coronal Mass Ejection speeds on Time-of-Arrival prediction performance using the Effective Acceleration Model
Evangelos Paouris, Angelos Vourlidas, Athanasios Papaioannou,, Anastasios Anastasiadis

TL;DR
This study introduces a new method for correcting CME speeds from single viewpoint observations, significantly improving the accuracy of space weather forecasts by reducing projection-related errors in CME speed estimates.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel approach for deprojecting CME speeds assuming radial propagation, with bounds based on multiview observations, enhancing prediction accuracy across all source longitudes.
Findings
Deprojected speeds are on average 12.8% greater than POS speeds.
The method reduces ToA prediction MAE to 11.6 hours for certain CME speeds.
Shallow ice-cream model outperforms for fast CMEs, full ice-cream for slow CMEs.
Abstract
White light images of Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) are projections on the plane-of-sky (POS). As a result, CME kinematics are subject to projection effects. The error in the true (deprojected) speed of CMEs is one of the main causes of uncertainty to Space Weather forecasts, since all estimates of the CME Time-of-Arrival (ToA) at a certain location within the heliosphere require, as input, the CME speed. We use single viewpoint observations for 1037 flare-CME events between 1996-2017 and propose a new approach for the correction of the CME speed assuming radial propagation from the flare site. Our method is uniquely capable to produce physically reasonable deprojected speeds across the full range of source longitudes. We bound the uncertainty in the deprojected speed estimates via limits in the true angular width of a CME based on multiview-point observations. Our corrections range up…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
