Discourse Parsing of Contentious, Non-Convergent Online Discussions
Stepan Zakharov, Omri Hadar, Tovit Hakak, Dina Grossman, Yifat, Ben-David Kolikant, Oren Tsur

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new theoretical and computational framework for analyzing contentious, non-convergent online discussions, including a novel annotation schema, classification models, and a labeled dataset, to better understand polarized discourse.
Contribution
It proposes a novel discourse annotation schema and computational models tailored for contentious discussions, along with the first labeled dataset for such discussions.
Findings
Achieved an average F-Score of 0.61 with multiple models.
Developed a hierarchical annotation schema reflecting discursive strategies.
Provided a labeled dataset for contentious online discussions.
Abstract
Online discourse is often perceived as polarized and unproductive. While some conversational discourse parsing frameworks are available, they do not naturally lend themselves to the analysis of contentious and polarizing discussions. Inspired by the Bakhtinian theory of Dialogism, we propose a novel theoretical and computational framework, better suited for non-convergent discussions. We redefine the measure of a successful discussion, and develop a novel discourse annotation schema which reflects a hierarchy of discursive strategies. We consider an array of classification models -- from Logistic Regression to BERT. We also consider various feature types and representations, e.g., LIWC categories, standard embeddings, conversational sequences, and non-conversational discourse markers learnt separately. Given the 31 labels in the tagset, an average F-Score of 0.61 is achieved if we allow…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Speech and dialogue systems · Social Media and Politics
MethodsLinear Layer · Linear Warmup With Linear Decay · WordPiece · Multi-Head Attention · Residual Connection · Adam · Dense Connections · Refunds@Expedia|||How do I get a full refund from Expedia? · Weight Decay · Dropout
