Frequency Sub-Sampling of Ultrasound Non-Destructive Measurements: Acquisition, Reconstruction and Performance
Jan Kirchhof, Sebastian Semper, Christoph W. Wagner, Eduardo P\'erez,, Florian R\"omer, Giovanni Del Galdo

TL;DR
This paper introduces sub-sampling strategies for ultrasound nondestructive testing that enable high-resolution 3D defect imaging from minimal Fourier measurements, combining theoretical analysis with practical reconstruction methods.
Contribution
It proposes and compares Fourier coefficient selection strategies and integrates them with $ extit{l}_1$-minimization for efficient, high-resolution defect imaging from low-rate measurements.
Findings
High-resolution 3D reconstructions achievable from as low as one Fourier coefficient per scan.
Subsampling strategies outperform traditional methods in resolution and data efficiency.
Matrix-free implementation exploits Toeplitz structure for computational efficiency.
Abstract
In ultrasound nondestructive testing, a widespread approach is to take synthetic aperture measurements from the surface of a specimen to detect and locate defects within it. Based on these measurements, imaging is usually performed using the Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique (SAFT). However, SAFT is sub-optimal in terms of resolution and requires oversampling in time domain to obtain a fine grid for the Delay-and-Sum (DAS). On the other hand, parametric reconstruction algorithms give better resolution, but their usage for imaging becomes computationally expensive due to the size of the parameter space and the large amount of measurement data in realistic 3-D scenarios. In the literature, the remedies to this are twofold: First, the amount of measurement data can be reduced using state of the art sub-Nyquist sampling approaches to measure Fourier coefficients instead of time domain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
