Comparison Between Different Topological Models of Concurrency
Joshua F. Lieber

TL;DR
This paper compares various topological models of concurrency, establishing equivalences between them and introducing new categorical frameworks to better understand concurrent computing.
Contribution
It provides explicit non-Quillen and Quillen equivalences between key models of concurrency and introduces the category of boxed symmetric trees as a flexible new framework.
Findings
Explicit non-Quillen equivalence between precubical sets and flows.
Quillen equivalence between simplicial semicategories and flows.
Boxed symmetric trees form a test category with potential for modeling concurrency.
Abstract
In this note, we provide an explicit non-Quillen equivalence between the category of precubical sets and Gaucher's category of flows via a class of "realization functors" (with mild assumptions on the cofibrations of the category of precubical sets). In addition, we demonstrate a Quillen equivalence between simplicial semicategories and flows before proving that simplicial semicategories satisfy many of the same properties as flows. Finally, we introduce the category of boxed symmetric trees, presheaves on which may provide a slightly more flexible setting for concurrent computing than (pre)cubical sets, before showing that when endowed with degeneracies, the aforementioned presheaf category is a test category (although not strict test).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
