Overcoming Barriers to Data Sharing with Medical Image Generation: A Comprehensive Evaluation

TL;DR

This study evaluates the use of GAN-generated synthetic medical images as a privacy-preserving alternative to real data sharing, demonstrating comparable utility under certain conditions and providing practical guidelines for their use.

Contribution

It offers a comprehensive benchmark and analysis of GAN-generated medical images, highlighting their potential and limitations for research and data sharing.

Findings

Synthetic data benefits from fewer label combinations.

Label overfitting affects GAN training at low sample sizes.

Radiologists cannot reliably distinguish synthetic from real images at intermediate resolutions.

Abstract

Privacy concerns around sharing personally identifiable information are a major practical barrier to data sharing in medical research. However, in many cases, researchers have no interest in a particular individual's information but rather aim to derive insights at the level of cohorts. Here, we utilize Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to create derived medical imaging datasets consisting entirely of synthetic patient data. The synthetic images ideally have, in aggregate, similar statistical properties to those of a source dataset but do not contain sensitive personal information. We assess the quality of synthetic data generated by two GAN models for chest radiographs with 14 different radiology findings and brain computed tomography (CT) scans with six types of intracranial hemorrhages. We measure the synthetic image quality by the performance difference of predictive models trained on either the synthetic or the real dataset. We find that synthetic data performance disproportionately benefits from a reduced number of unique label combinations. Our open-source benchmark also indicates that at low number of samples per class, label overfitting effects start to dominate GAN training. We additionally conducted a reader study in which trained radiologists do not perform better than random on discriminating between synthetic and real medical images for intermediate levels of resolutions. In accordance with our benchmark results, the classification accuracy of radiologists increases at higher spatial resolution levels. Our study offers valuable guidelines and outlines practical conditions under which insights derived from synthetic medical images are similar to those that would have been derived from real imaging data. Our results indicate that synthetic data sharing may be an attractive and privacy-preserving alternative to sharing real patient-level data in the right settings.