The Thousand-Pulsar-Array programme on MeerKAT II: observing strategy for pulsar monitoring with subarrays
X. Song, P. Weltevrede, M. J. Keith, S. Johnston, A. Karastergiou, M., Bailes, E. D. Barr, S. Buchner, M. Geyer, B. V. Hugo, A. Jameson, A., Parthasarathy, D. J. Reardon, M. Serylak, R. M. Shannon, R. Spiewak, W. van, Straten, V. Venkatraman Krishnan

TL;DR
This paper presents an optimized observing strategy for the Thousand Pulsar Array project using MeerKAT, ensuring high-quality pulse profiles for pulsar monitoring and demonstrating its effectiveness through data analysis and comparison of array configurations.
Contribution
It introduces a method to determine optimal observing times for pulsar monitoring with subarrays, validated with real telescope data, and discusses strategies for future large-scale telescopes like SKA.
Findings
Two 32-dish subarrays are most efficient for MeerKAT pulsar monitoring.
The proposed method reliably produces high fidelity pulse profiles.
Array configuration flexibility is crucial for future large telescopes.
Abstract
The Thousand Pulsar Array (TPA) project currently monitors about 500 pulsars with the sensitive MeerKAT radio telescope by using subarrays to observe multiple sources simultaneously. Here we define the adopted observing strategy, which guarantees that each target is observed long enough to obtain a high fidelity pulse profile, thereby reaching a sufficient precision of a simple pulse shape parameter. This precision is estimated from the contribution of the system noise of the telescope, and the pulse-to-pulse variability of each pulsar, which we quantify under some simplifying assumptions. We test the assumptions and choice of model parameters using data from the MeerKAT 64-dish array, Lovell and Parkes telescopes. We demonstrate that the observing times derived from our method produce high fidelity pulse profiles that meet the needs of the TPA in studying pulse shape variability and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
