Plasma Performance and Operational Space without ELMs in DIII-D
C. Paz-Soldan

TL;DR
This study compares various stationary no-ELM plasma regimes in DIII-D, analyzing their operational space and performance metrics, revealing key differences in constraints, pedestal behavior, and suitability for high-performance, high-power operation.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of no-ELM regimes in DIII-D, highlighting operational constraints and performance characteristics, especially in relation to pedestal pressure and core rotation effects.
Findings
Normalized performance favors RMP, QH, and Neg-D regimes.
Absolute performance rises linearly with plasma current and magnetic field.
QH regime achieves higher pedestal pressure than RMP, with performance linked to core rotation and carbon fraction.
Abstract
A database of DIII-D plasmas without ELMs compares the operating space and plasma performance of stationary no-ELM regimes: RMP-ELM suppression, QH-mode, I-mode, EDA H-mode, L-mode, and negative triangularity L-mode (Neg-D). Operational space is documented in terms of engineering and physics parameters, revealing divergent constraints. Some operational space discriminants (such as pedestal collisionality) are well known, while others, such as low torque & safety factor, or high power & density, are less commonly emphasized. Normalized performance (confinement quality and normalized pressure) also discriminate the no-ELM regimes and favor the regimes tolerant to power in DIII-D: RMP, QH, and Neg-D. Absolute performance (triple product ) also discriminates no-ELM regimes and is found to rise linearly with IaB and also benefits from tolerance to power. The highest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
