Better Experimental Design by Hybridizing Binary Matching with Imbalance Optimization
Abba M. Krieger, David Azriel, Adam Kapelner

TL;DR
This paper introduces a hybrid experimental design method combining optimal nonbipartite matching with greedy switching to reduce covariate imbalance and improve treatment effect estimation robustness, especially for nonlinear response models.
Contribution
It proposes a novel hybrid design that enhances covariate balance and robustness by integrating matching with greedy switching heuristics, outperforming previous methods.
Findings
Significantly reduces covariate imbalance to rate $O_p(n^{-4})$
Improves mean squared error in nonlinear response models
Maintains robustness to unobserved covariates
Abstract
We present a new experimental design procedure that divides a set of experimental units into two groups in order to minimize error in estimating an additive treatment effect. One concern is minimizing error at the experimental design stage is large covariate imbalance between the two groups. Another concern is robustness of design to misspecification in response models. We address both concerns in our proposed design: we first place subjects into pairs using optimal nonbipartite matching, making our estimator robust to complicated non-linear response models. Our innovation is to keep the matched pairs extant, take differences of the covariate values within each matched pair and then we use the greedy switching heuristic of Krieger et al. (2019) or rerandomization on these differences. This latter step greatly reduce covariate imbalance to the rate in the case of one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
