Neuroscience and Literacy: An Integrative View
George Ellis, Carole Bloch

TL;DR
This paper presents an integrative neuroscience perspective on literacy, emphasizing prediction, emotion, and socio-cultural factors, challenging traditional views and highlighting early neural routes to reading.
Contribution
It offers a novel, comprehensive framework linking brain function, emotion, and socio-cultural practices to improve literacy teaching and understanding.
Findings
Reading involves non-linear predictive processes.
Emotions significantly influence motivation and learning.
Early neural pathways support reading without explicit decoding.
Abstract
Significant challenges exist globally regarding literacy teaching and learning. To address these challenges, key features of how the brain works should be taken into account. First, perception is an active process based in detection of errors in hierarchical predictions of sensory data and action outcomes. Reading is a particular case of this non-linear predictive process. Second, emotions play a key role in underlying cognitive functioning, including oral and written language. Negative emotions undermine motivation to learn. Third, there is not the fundamental difference between listening/speaking and reading/writing often alleged on the basis of evolutionary arguments. Both are socio-cultural practices that are driven through the communication imperative of the social brain. Fourth, both listening and reading are contextually occurring pyscho-social practices of understanding, shaped…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
