Odoni's conjecture on arboreal Galois representations is false
Philip Dittmann, Borys Kadets

TL;DR
The paper disproves Odoni's conjecture by showing that for Hilbertian fields, there is no polynomial with a surjective arboreal Galois representation, challenging previous assumptions in number theory.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample to Odoni's conjecture, demonstrating that the expected surjectivity of arboreal Galois representations does not always hold.
Findings
Odoni's conjecture is false for Hilbertian fields.
No polynomial has a surjective arboreal Galois representation in this setting.
The result impacts understanding of Galois actions on preimage trees.
Abstract
Suppose is a polynomial. The absolute Galois group of acts on the preimage tree of under . The resulting homomorphism is called the arboreal Galois representation. Odoni conjectured that for all Hilbertian fields there exists a polynomial for which is surjective. We show that this conjecture is false.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
