Fusing Optical and SAR time series for LAI gap filling with multioutput Gaussian processes

TL;DR

This paper introduces a Multi-Output Gaussian Process approach to fuse SAR and optical satellite data, effectively filling gaps in LAI measurements caused by cloud cover, especially during long data gaps.

Contribution

The study demonstrates the novel application of MOGP for fusing SAR and optical data to improve LAI gap filling, particularly over long cloud-covered periods.

Findings

MOGP outperforms standard GP in LAI estimation during long data gaps.

MOGP provides reliable LAI estimates over cloudy periods using SAR data.

Results show significant improvement in R² and RMSE metrics for long gaps.

Abstract

The availability of satellite optical information is often hampered by the natural presence of clouds, which can be problematic for many applications. Persistent clouds over agricultural fields can mask key stages of crop growth, leading to unreliable yield predictions. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) provides all-weather imagery which can potentially overcome this limitation, but given its high and distinct sensitivity to different surface properties, the fusion of SAR and optical data still remains an open challenge. In this work, we propose the use of Multi-Output Gaussian Process (MOGP) regression, a machine learning technique that learns automatically the statistical relationships among multisensor time series, to detect vegetated areas over which the synergy between SAR-optical imageries is profitable. For this purpose, we use the Sentinel-1 Radar Vegetation Index (RVI) and Sentinel-2 Leaf Area Index (LAI) time series over a study area in north west of the Iberian peninsula. Through a physical interpretation of MOGP trained models, we show its ability to provide estimations of LAI even over cloudy periods using the information shared with RVI, which guarantees the solution keeps always tied to real measurements. Results demonstrate the advantage of MOGP especially for long data gaps, where optical-based methods notoriously fail. The leave-one-image-out assessment technique applied to the whole vegetation cover shows MOGP predictions improve standard GP estimations over short-time gaps (R$^2$ of 74\% vs 68\%, RMSE of 0.4 vs 0.44 $[m^2m^{-2}]$) and especially over long-time gaps (R$^2$ of 33\% vs 12\%, RMSE of 0.5 vs 1.09 $[m^2m^{-2}]$).