The DeRisk database: Extreme Design Waves for Offshore Wind Turbines

TL;DR

This paper introduces the DeRisk database, a comprehensive dataset of fully nonlinear wave kinematics for offshore wind turbine design, validated against experiments and useful for predicting extreme wave loads more accurately.

Contribution

The paper presents the creation and validation of the DeRisk database using OceanWave3D, enabling efficient, accurate extraction of nonlinear wave kinematics for offshore wind turbine design.

Findings

The database shows excellent agreement with experimental results at two water depths.

For milder storms, the methodology aligns well with standard practices.

For strong storms, the database provides more accurate estimates of extreme loads.

Abstract

The estimation of extreme loads from waves is an essential part of the design of an offshore wind turbine. Standard design codes suggest to either use simplified methods based on regular waves, or to perform fully nonlinear computations. The former might not provide an accurate representation of the extreme waves, while the latter is computationally too intensive for design iterations. We address these limitations by using the fully nonlinear solver OceanWave3D to establish the DeRisk database, a large dataset of extreme waves kinematics in a two-dimensional domain. From the database, which is open and freely available, a designer can extract fully-nonlinear wave kinematics for a wave condition and water depth of interest by identifying a suitable computation in the database and, if needed, by Froude-scaling the kinematics. The nonlinear solver is validated against the DeRisk model experiments at two different water depths, $33.0 [m]$ and $20.0 [m]$, and an excellent agreement is found for the analyzed cases. The experiments are used to calibrate OceanWave3D's numerical breaking filter constant, and the best agreement is found for $\beta=0.5$. We compare the experimental static force with predictions by the DeRisk database and the Rainey force model, and with state-of-the-art industrial practices. For milder storms, we find a good agreement in the predicted extreme force between the present methodology and the standard methodologies. At the deep location and for stronger storms, the largest loads are given by slamming loads due to breaking waves. In this condition, the database methodology is less accurate than the embedded stream function method and more accurate than the WiFi JIP methodology, providing generally nonconservative estimates. For strong storms at the shallower location, where wave breaking is less dominating, the database methodology is the most accurate overall.