Connecting $k$-Naples parking functions and obstructed parking functions via involutions
Roger Tian

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between $k$-Naples parking functions and classical parking functions, establishing bijections and bounds that deepen understanding of parking function generalizations.
Contribution
It introduces a bijection between contained $k$-Naples parking functions and classical parking functions, and extends this to relate $k$-Naples functions to obstructed parking functions.
Findings
Contained $k$-Naples parking functions have the same cardinality as classical parking functions.
A bijection is established between $k$-Naples and classical parking functions.
An injection into obstructed parking functions provides an upper bound for $k$-Naples functions.
Abstract
Parking functions were classically defined for cars attempting to park on a one-way street with parking spots, where cars only drive forward. Subsequently, parking functions have been generalized in various ways, including allowing cars the option of driving backward. The set of -Naples parking functions have cars who can drive backward a maximum of steps before driving forward. A recursive formula for has been obtained, though deriving a closed formula for appears difficult. In addition, an important subset of , called the contained -Naples parking functions, has been shown, with a non-bijective proof, to have the same cardinality as that of the set of classical parking functions, independent of . In this paper, we study -Naples parking functions in the more general context of cars and …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
