Band alignment of monolayer CaP$_3$, CaAs$_3$, BaAs$_3$ and the role of $p$-$d$ orbital interactions in the formation of conduction band minima
Magdalena Laurien, Himanshu Saini, Oleg Rubel

TL;DR
This study investigates the band alignment of monolayer CaP$_3$, CaAs$_3$, and BaAs$_3$ using quasiparticle calculations, revealing type-II heterojunctions and the influence of $p$-$d$ orbital interactions on their electronic properties.
Contribution
It provides the first quasiparticle-level band alignment analysis of these 2D materials, highlighting the role of $p$-$d$ interactions in their conduction band formation.
Findings
All three monolayers form type-II heterojunctions.
Quasiparticle gaps are 2.1 eV (CaP$_3$), 1.8 eV (CaAs$_3$), 1.5 eV (BaAs$_3$).
The indirect gap in BaAs$_3$ is due to strong As $3p$ - Ba $5d$ bonding.
Abstract
Recently, a number of new two-dimensional (2D) materials based on puckered phosphorene and arsenene have been predicted with moderate band gaps, good absorption properties and carrier mobilities superior to transition metal dichalcogenides. For heterojunction applications, it is important to know the relative band alignment of these new 2D materials. We report the band alignment of puckered CaP, CaAs and BaAs monolayers at the quasiparticle level of theory (GW), calculating band offsets for isolated monolayers according to the electron affinity rule. Our calculations suggest that monolayer CaP, CaAs and BaAs all form type-II (staggered) heterojunctions. Their quasiparticle gaps are 2.1 (direct), 1.8 (direct) and 1.5 eV (indirect), respectively. We also examine trends in the electronic structure in the light of chemical bonding analysis. We show that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
