On the Use of Field RR Lyrae as Galactic Probes. II. A new $\Delta$S calibration to estimate their metallicity
J. Crestani (1,2,3), M. Fabrizio (3,4), V.F. Braga (3,4), C. Sneden, (5), G.W. Preston (6), I. Ferraro (3), G. Iannicola (3), G. Bono (2,3), A., Alves-Brito (1), M. Nonino (7), V. D'Orazi (8,9), L. Inno (10), M. Monelli, (11), J. Storm (12), G. Altavilla (3,4), B. Chaboyer (13)

TL;DR
This study presents a comprehensive spectroscopic survey of field RR Lyrae stars and introduces a new calibration method for estimating their metallicity using the ΔS technique, applicable over the entire pulsation cycle and including RRc variables.
Contribution
The paper develops a novel empirical ΔS calibration for RR Lyrae metallicity that incorporates spectra over the full pulsation cycle and includes RRc variables, covering a wide metallicity range.
Findings
The new calibration provides metallicity estimates consistent with literature.
RRc stars are on average 0.10 dex more metal-poor than RRab stars.
The metallicity distribution shows a well-defined tail approaching solar abundance.
Abstract
We performed the largest and most homogeneous spectroscopic survey of field RR Lyraes (RRLs). We secured 6,300 high resolution (HR, R35,000) spectra for 143 RRLs (111 fundamental, RRab; 32 first overtone, RRc). The atmospheric parameters were estimated by using the traditional approach and the iron abundances were measured by using an LTE line analysis. The resulting iron distribution shows a well defined metal-rich tail approaching solar iron abundance. This suggests that field RRLs experienced a complex chemical enrichment in the early halo formation. We used these data to develop a new calibration of the S method. This diagnostic, based on the equivalent widths of CaII K and three Balmer (H) lines, traces the metallicity of RRLs. For the first time the new empirical calibration: i) includes spectra collected over the entire pulsation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
