The role of core-collapse physics in the observability of black-hole neutron-star mergers as multi-messenger sources
Jaime Rom\'an-Garza, Simone S. Bavera, Tassos Fragos, Emmanouil, Zapartas, Devina Misra, Jeff Andrews, Scotty Coughlin, Aaron Dotter,, Konstantinos Kovlakas, Juan Gabriel Serra, Ying Qin, Kyle A. Rocha, Nam, Hai Tran

TL;DR
This study shows that detailed core-collapse physics significantly increases predicted black-hole neutron-star merger rates and affects electromagnetic counterpart predictions, highlighting the importance of realistic supernova models in gravitational wave source modeling.
Contribution
It introduces the impact of detailed core-collapse simulations on BH-NS merger predictions, contrasting with standard parametric models, and explores implications for multi-messenger astronomy.
Findings
Merger detection rate increases by 5-10 times with detailed models.
Electromagnetic counterpart probability ranges from 2% to 25%.
Most systems with EM counterparts have the NS as the first-born, if NS radius ≤ 12 km.
Abstract
Recent detailed 1D core-collapse simulations have brought new insights on the final fate of massive stars, which are in contrast to commonly used parametric prescriptions. In this work, we explore the implications of these results to the formation of coalescing black-hole (BH) - neutron-star (NS) binaries, such as the candidate event GW190426_152155 reported in GWTC-2. Furthermore, we investigate the effects of natal kicks and the NS's radius on the synthesis of such systems and potential electromagnetic counterparts linked to them. Synthetic models based on detailed core-collapse simulations result in an increased merger detection rate of BH-NS systems ( yr), 5 to 10 times larger than the predictions of "standard" parametric prescriptions. This is primarily due to the formation of low-mass BH via direct collapse, and hence no natal kicks, favored by the detailed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
