Filtering and improved Uncertainty Quantification in the dynamic estimation of effective reproduction numbers
Marcos A. Capistr\'an, Antonio Capella, J. Andr\'es Christen

TL;DR
This paper improves the Bayesian estimation of the effective reproduction number in infectious diseases by incorporating an autoregressive process, leading to better uncertainty quantification and practical applicability in epidemic monitoring.
Contribution
It introduces a novel filtering-based Bayesian method with an autoregressive component for more accurate $R_t$ uncertainty estimation, enhancing existing models.
Findings
Enhanced uncertainty quantification in $R_t$ estimates.
Explicit calculations using conjugate analysis.
Application to COVID-19 data in Mexico.
Abstract
The effective reproduction number measures an infectious disease's transmissibility as the number of secondary infections in one reproduction time in a population having both susceptible and non-susceptible hosts. Current approaches do not quantify the uncertainty correctly in estimating , as expected by the observed variability in contagion patterns. We elaborate on the Bayesian estimation of by improving on the Poisson sampling model of Cori et al. (2013). By adding an autoregressive latent process, we build a Dynamic Linear Model on the log of observed s, resulting in a filtering type Bayesian inference. We use a conjugate analysis, and all calculations are explicit. Results show an improved uncertainty quantification on the estimation of 's, with a reliable method that could safely be used by non-experts and within other forecasting systems. We illustrate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
