Probing the Black Hole Metric. I. Black Hole Shadows and Binary Black-Hole Inspirals
Dimitrios Psaltis, Colm Talbot, Ethan Payne, Ilya Mandel

TL;DR
This paper assesses current observational limits on deviations from the Kerr black hole metric using black-hole shadows and binary inspiral data, finding no evidence for deviations across a wide range of masses and curvatures.
Contribution
It quantifies how current observations constrain deviations from the Kerr metric and discusses how future low-mass black hole detections could improve these constraints.
Findings
No evidence for deviations from Kerr metric across diverse black hole masses.
Current constraints are correlated and primarily affect the tt-components of the spacetime.
Future low-mass black hole observations could break parameter degeneracies.
Abstract
In General Relativity, the spacetimes of black holes have three fundamental properties: (i) they are the same, to lowest order in spin, as the metrics of stellar objects; (ii) they are independent of mass, when expressed in geometric units; and (iii) they are described by the Kerr metric. In this paper, we quantify the upper bounds on potential black-hole metric deviations imposed by observations of black-hole shadows and of binary black-hole inspirals in order to explore the current experimental limits on possible violations of the last two predictions. We find that both types of experiments provide correlated constraints on deviation parameters that are primarily in the tt-components of the spacetimes, when expressed in areal coordinates. We conclude that, currently, there is no evidence for a deviations from the Kerr metric across the 8 orders of magnitudes in masses and 16 orders in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
