Does a typical $\ell_p\,$-$\,$space contraction have a non-trivial invariant subspace?
Sophie Grivaux, \'Etienne Matheron, Quentin Menet

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether typical contraction operators on classical Banach spaces like nd have non-trivial invariant subspaces, using Baire category methods in various operator topologies.
Contribution
It provides new results on the prevalence of invariant subspaces among typical contractions in certain topologies, especially the Strong and Strong* Operator Topologies.
Findings
In the Strong Operator Topology, typical contractions have non-trivial invariant subspaces.
In the Strong* Operator Topology, the existence of invariant subspaces for typical contractions is analyzed.
The results depend on the chosen topology and the space nd .
Abstract
Given a Polish topology on , the set of all contraction operators on , or , we prove several results related to the following question: does a typical in the Baire Category sense has a non-trivial invariant subspace? In other words, is there a dense set such that every has a non-trivial invariant subspace? We mostly focus on the Strong Operator Topology and the Strong Operator Topology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHolomorphic and Operator Theory · Advanced Banach Space Theory · Fixed Point Theorems Analysis
