Chemical abundances in Seyfert galaxies -- V. The discovery of shocked emission outside the AGN ionization axis
R. A. Riffel, O. L. Dors, M. Armah, T. Storchi-Bergmann, A. Feltre, G., F. Hagele, M. V. Cardaci, D. Ruschel-Dutra, A. C Krabbe, E. Perez-Montero, N., L. Zakamska, I. C. Freitas

TL;DR
This study maps electron temperatures in three Seyfert galaxies, revealing shock-ionization outside the AGN ionization axis, which highlights the role of shocks in galaxy gas dynamics beyond standard photoionization effects.
Contribution
It provides the first direct evidence of shock-ionization outside the AGN ionization cones in Seyfert galaxies, expanding understanding of galaxy gas interactions.
Findings
Shocks influence electron temperature distributions in Seyfert galaxies.
Shock-ionization observed orthogonal to the ionization axis.
Photoionization models suffice for some galaxies, but shocks dominate others.
Abstract
We present maps for the electron temperature in the inner kpc of three luminous Seyfert galaxies: Mrk 79, Mrk 348, and Mrk 607 obtained from Gemini GMOS-IFU observations at spatial resolutions of 110-280 pc. We study the distributions of electron temperature in active galaxies and find temperatures varying in the range from 8000 to >30000 K. Shocks due to gas outflows play an important role in the observed temperature distributions of Mrk 79 and Mrk 348, while standard photoionization models reproduce the derived temperature values for Mrk 607. In Mrk 79 and Mrk 348, we find direct evidence for shock-ionization with overall orientation orthogonal to the ionization axis, where shocks can be easily observed as the AGN radiation field is shielded by the nuclear dusty torus. This also indicates that even when the ionization cones are narrow, the shocks can be much wider-angle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
