Charge radii of exotic potassium isotopes challenge nuclear theory and the magic character of $N = 32$
\'A. Koszor\'us, X. F. Yang, W. G. Jiang, S. J. Novario, S. W. Bai, J., Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bissell, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, R., P. de Groote, A. Ekstr\"om, K. T. Flanagan, C. Forss\'en, S. Franchoo, R. F., Garcia Ruiz, F. P. Gustafsson, G. Hagen

TL;DR
This study extends charge radii measurements of potassium isotopes up to $^{52}$K, challenging the presumed magic nature of $N=32$ and revealing discrepancies between experimental data and current nuclear theories.
Contribution
It provides the first charge radii data beyond $N=32$ in potassium isotopes and compares these results with advanced nuclear models, highlighting their limitations.
Findings
No signature of magic character at $N=32$
Strong increase in charge radii beyond $N=28$ not captured by coupled-cluster calculations
Fayans functional reproduces radius increase but overestimates odd-even staggering
Abstract
Nuclear charge radii are sensitive probes of different aspects of the nucleon-nucleon interaction and the bulk properties of nuclear matter; thus, they provide a stringent test and challenge for nuclear theory. The calcium region has been of particular interest, as experimental evidence has suggested a new magic number at [1-3], while the unexpectedly large increases in the charge radii [4,5] open new questions about the evolution of nuclear size in neutron-rich systems. By combining the collinear resonance ionization spectroscopy method with -decay detection, we were able to extend the charge radii measurement of potassium () isotopes up to the exotic K ( = 110 ms), produced in minute quantities. Our work provides the first charge radii measurement beyond in the region, revealing no signature of the magic character at this neutron number.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
