Sample Complexity of Policy Gradient Finding Second-Order Stationary Points
Long Yang, Qian Zheng, Gang Pan

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the sample complexity of policy gradient methods in reinforcement learning, showing convergence to second-order stationary points (maxima) with improved efficiency over previous results.
Contribution
It introduces a new analysis framework for policy gradient convergence to SOSP, significantly reducing the sample complexity required to find local maxima.
Findings
Converges to SOSP with high probability after fewer samples.
Improves previous sample complexity bounds by a substantial margin.
Decomposes parameter space into regions for targeted local improvements.
Abstract
The goal of policy-based reinforcement learning (RL) is to search the maximal point of its objective. However, due to the inherent non-concavity of its objective, convergence to a first-order stationary point (FOSP) can not guarantee the policy gradient methods finding a maximal point. A FOSP can be a minimal or even a saddle point, which is undesirable for RL. Fortunately, if all the saddle points are \emph{strict}, all the second-order stationary points (SOSP) are exactly equivalent to local maxima. Instead of FOSP, we consider SOSP as the convergence criteria to character the sample complexity of policy gradient. Our result shows that policy gradient converges to an -SOSP with probability at least after the total cost of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsReinforcement Learning in Robotics · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
