Predominant Contribution of Direct Laser Acceleration to High-Energy Electron Spectra in a Low-Density Self-Modulated Laser Wakefield Accelerator
P. M. King, K. Miller, N. Lemos, J. L. Shaw, B. F. Kraus, M., Thibodeau, B. M. Hegelich, J.Hinojosa, P. Michel, C. Joshi, K. A. Marsh, W., Mori, A. Pak, A. G. R. Thomas, F. Albert

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that direct laser acceleration (DLA) significantly contributes to high-energy electron spectra in a low-density self-modulated laser wakefield accelerator, supported by experimental observations and detailed simulations.
Contribution
It reveals the dominant role of DLA in producing high-energy electrons, a novel insight supported by experimental data and advanced simulations.
Findings
High-energy electrons (>60 MeV) mainly gain energy from DLA.
Two-temperature electron spectra are observed and reproduced in simulations.
DLA electrons lose energy to the laser's longitudinal field, affecting net energy gain.
Abstract
The two-temperature relativistic electron spectrum from a low-density (~cm) self-modulated laser wakefield accelerator (SM-LWFA) is observed to transition between temperatures of and MeV at an electron energy of about 100 MeV. When the electrons are dispersed orthogonally to the laser polarization, their spectrum above 60 MeV shows a forking structure characteristic of direct laser acceleration (DLA). Both the two-temperature distribution and the forking structure are reproduced in a quasi-3D \textsc{Osiris} simulation of the interaction of the 1-ps, moderate-amplitude () laser pulse with the low-density plasma. Particle tracking shows that while the SM-LWFA mechanism dominates below 40 MeV, the highest-energy ( MeV) electrons gain most of their energy through DLA. By separating the simulated electric fields into modes, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
