Most big mapping class groups fail the Tits Alternative
Daniel Allcock

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the mapping class groups of certain infinite-type surfaces do not satisfy the Tits Alternative, revealing complex subgroup structures that challenge previous assumptions about these groups.
Contribution
It proves that for a broad class of infinite-type surfaces, their mapping class groups contain finitely generated subgroups that are not virtually solvable and lack nonabelian free groups.
Findings
Mapping class groups of infinite-type surfaces do not satisfy the Tits Alternative.
Existence of finitely generated, non-virtually solvable subgroups without free groups.
Challenges previous beliefs about the structure of mapping class groups.
Abstract
Let be a surface, possibly with boundary. Suppose it has infinite genus or infinitely many punctures, or a closed subset which is a disk with a Cantor set removed from its interior. For example, could be any surface of infinite type with only finitely many boundary components. We prove that the mapping class group of does not satisfy the Tits Alternative. That is, Map contains a finitely generated subgroup that is not virtually solvable and contains no nonabelian free group.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
