Self-testing maximally-dimensional genuinely entangled subspaces within the stabilizer formalism
Owidiusz Makuta, Remigiusz Augusiak

TL;DR
This paper investigates the maximum dimension of genuinely entangled subspaces within the stabilizer formalism that can be self-tested, providing a framework, explicit constructions, and Bell inequalities for their certification.
Contribution
It introduces an efficient method to check genuine entanglement in stabilizer subspaces, determines their maximal dimension, and constructs Bell inequalities for self-testing these subspaces.
Findings
Maximal dimension of self-testable genuinely entangled stabilizer subspaces is established.
Explicit constructions of maximally-dimensional entangled subspaces for any number of qubits are provided.
Bell inequalities are developed that are maximally violated by states in these subspaces, aiding self-testing.
Abstract
Self-testing was originally introduced as a device-independent method of certification of entangled quantum states and local measurements performed on them. Recently, in [F. Baccari \textit{et al.}, arXiv:2003.02285] the notion of state self-testing has been generalized to entangled subspaces and the first self-testing strategies for exemplary genuinely entangled subspaces have been given. The main aim of our work is to pursue this line of research and to address the question how "large" (in terms of dimension) are genuinely entangled subspaces that can be self-tested, concentrating on the multiqubit stabilizer formalism. To this end, we first introduce a framework allowing to efficiently check whether a given stabilizer subspace is genuinely entangled. Building on it, we then determine the maximal dimension of genuinely entangled subspaces that can be constructed within the stabilizer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
