Spatially resolved direct method metallicity in a high-redshift analogue local galaxy: temperature structure impact on metallicity gradients
Alex J. Cameron, Tiantian Yuan, Michele Trenti, David C. Nicholls and, Lisa J. Kewley

TL;DR
This study examines how assumptions about temperature structures in HII regions influence direct-method metallicity measurements and gradients in a local galaxy, emphasizing the need for high-resolution data and multiple emission lines.
Contribution
It demonstrates that different methods of deriving metallicity can lead to significantly different gradient results, highlighting the importance of considering temperature structure assumptions.
Findings
Different direct methods yield contrasting metallicity gradients.
Strong-line diagnostics tend to produce flatter gradients.
Overlooked temperature structures can cause large discrepancies in metallicity studies.
Abstract
We investigate how HII region temperature structure assumptions affect "direct-method" spatially-resolved metallicity observations using multispecies auroral lines in a galaxy from the SAMI Galaxy Survey. SAMI609396B, at redshift , is a low-mass galaxy in a minor merger with intense star formation, analogous to conditions at high redshifts. We use three methods to derive direct metallicities and compare with strong-line diagnostics. The spatial metallicity trends show significant differences among the three direct methods. Our first method is based on the commonly used electron temperature ([OIII]) from the [OIII]4363 auroral line and a traditional ([OII]) -- ([OIII]) calibration. The second method applies a recent empirical correction to the O abundance from the [OIII]/[OII] strong-line ratio. The third method infers the ([OII]) from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
