Best Fit Bin Packing with Random Order Revisited
Susanne Albers, Arindam Khan, Leon Ladewig

TL;DR
This paper refines the understanding of Best Fit bin packing's performance under random item order, establishing new bounds for its random order ratio and exploring special cases with large items.
Contribution
It improves the lower bound of the random order ratio for Best Fit and analyzes its behavior with large items, also initiating the study of absolute random order ratio.
Findings
Lower bound of 1.10 for the random order ratio.
Convergence to 1.25 for instances with items larger than 1/3.
Absolute random order ratio is at least 1.3.
Abstract
Best Fit is a well known online algorithm for the bin packing problem, where a collection of one-dimensional items has to be packed into a minimum number of unit-sized bins. In a seminal work, Kenyon [SODA 1996] introduced the (asymptotic) random order ratio as an alternative performance measure for online algorithms. Here, an adversary specifies the items, but the order of arrival is drawn uniformly at random. Kenyon's result establishes lower and upper bounds of 1.08 and 1.5, respectively, for the random order ratio of Best Fit. Although this type of analysis model became increasingly popular in the field of online algorithms, no progress has been made for the Best Fit algorithm after the result of Kenyon. We study the random order ratio of Best Fit and tighten the long-standing gap by establishing an improved lower bound of 1.10. For the case where all items are larger than 1/3, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
