CycleGAN without checkerboard artifacts for counter-forensics of fake-image detection
Takayuki Osakabe, Miki Tanaka, Yuma Kinoshita, Hitoshi Kiya

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new CycleGAN model that eliminates checkerboard artifacts, enhancing the ability to counter-forensics in fake-image detection by addressing artifacts common in GAN-generated images.
Contribution
It presents the first CycleGAN architecture designed without checkerboard artifacts, improving fake-image detection and counter-forensics.
Findings
CycleGAN without checkerboard artifacts effectively counters forgery detection methods.
The proposed model reduces artifacts that compromise fake-image detection.
Enhanced robustness of fake-image detection against GAN-generated manipulations.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel CycleGAN without checkerboard artifacts for counter-forensics of fake-image detection. Recent rapid advances in image manipulation tools and deep image synthesis techniques, such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have easily generated fake images, so detecting manipulated images has become an urgent issue. Most state-of-the-art forgery detection methods assume that images include checkerboard artifacts which are generated by using DNNs. Accordingly, we propose a novel CycleGAN without any checkerboard artifacts for counter-forensics of fake-mage detection methods for the first time, as an example of GANs without checkerboard artifacts.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsBatch Normalization · GAN Least Squares Loss · Tanh Activation · Instance Normalization · Convolution · Residual Connection · PatchGAN · Sigmoid Activation · HuMan(Expedia)||How do I get a human at Expedia? · *Communicated@Fast*How Do I Communicate to Expedia?
