Topological superconductivity in tripartite superconductor-ferromagnet-semiconductor nanowires
Josias Langbehn, Sergio Acero Gonzalez, Piet W. Brouwer, and Felix von, Oppen

TL;DR
This paper investigates how topological superconductivity can emerge in tripartite nanowires composed of superconductor, ferromagnet, and semiconductor layers, highlighting the most promising configurations for realizing Majorana modes.
Contribution
It provides a self-consistent theoretical analysis of electronic properties in tripartite nanowires, identifying the superconductor-semiconductor-ferromagnet arrangement as the most viable for topological superconductivity.
Findings
Superconductor-semiconductor-ferromagnet arrangement is most effective.
Superconductivity is weakly affected by the ferromagnetic insulator.
Spin splitting and superconductivity are independently induced in the semiconductor.
Abstract
Motivated by recent experiments searching for Majorana zero modes in tripartite semiconductor nanowires with epitaxial superconductor and ferromagnetic-insulator layers, we explore the emergence of topological superconductivity in such devices for paradigmatic arrangements of the three constituents. Accounting for the competition between magnetism and superconductivity, we treat superconductivity self consistently and describe the electronic properties, including the superconducting and ferromagnetic proximity effects, within a direct wave-function approach. We conclude that the most viable mechanism for topological superconductivity relies on a superconductor-semiconductor-ferromagnet arrangement of the constituents, in which spin splitting and superconductivity are independently induced in the semiconductor by proximity and superconductivity is only weakly affected by the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
