A tale of two mergers: constraints on kilonova detection in two short GRBs at z$\sim$0.5

TL;DR

This paper analyzes two short gamma-ray bursts at z~0.5, constraining their kilonova emissions through multi-wavelength observations, revealing diverse environments and ejecta properties, and providing insights into their progenitors and host galaxies.

Contribution

It offers the first detailed comparison of kilonova constraints in two sGRBs at similar redshifts, highlighting the diversity in their environments and ejecta masses, and refining models of kilonova brightness and composition.

Findings

GRB 160624A's kilonova is constrained to be fainter than AT2017gfo.

GRB 200522A shows evidence of a luminous, red kilonova or dust extinction.

Host galaxy properties differ significantly, indicating diverse progenitor environments.

Abstract

We present a detailed multi-wavelength analysis of two short Gamma-Ray Bursts (sGRBs) detected by the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory: GRB 160624A at $z=0.483$ and GRB 200522A at $z=0.554$. These sGRBs demonstrate very different properties in their observed emission and environment. GRB 160624A is associated to a late-type galaxy with an old stellar population ($\approx$3 Gyr) and moderate on-going star formation ($\approx$1 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$). Hubble and Gemini limits on optical/nIR emission from GRB 160624A are among the most stringent for sGRBs, leading to tight constraints on the allowed kilonova properties. In particular, we rule out any kilonova brighter than AT2017gfo, disfavoring large masses of wind ejecta ($\lesssim$0.03 $M_\odot$). In contrast, observations of GRB 200522A uncovered a luminous ($L_\textrm{F125W}\approx 10^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$ at 2.3~d) and red ($r-H\approx 1.3$ mag) counterpart. The red color can be explained either by bright kilonova emission powered by the radioactive decay of a large amount of wind ejecta (0.03 $M_\odot$ $\lesssim$ $M$ $\lesssim$ 0.1 $M_\odot$) or moderate extinction, $E(B-V)\approx0.1-0.2$ mag, along the line of sight. The location of this sGRB in the inner regions of a young ($\approx$0.1 Gyr) star-forming ($\approx$2-6 $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$) galaxy and the limited sampling of its counterpart do not allow us to rule out dust effects as contributing, at least in part, to the red color.