Chern-Weil Global Symmetries and How Quantum Gravity Avoids Them
Ben Heidenreich, Jacob McNamara, Miguel Montero, Matthew Reece, Tom, Rudelius, Irene Valenzuela

TL;DR
This paper investigates a class of generalized global symmetries called Chern-Weil symmetries, their resistance to breaking in gauge theories, and how quantum gravity inherently avoids them through mechanisms like gauging or breaking, with implications for string theory and holography.
Contribution
It introduces Chern-Weil global symmetries, analyzes their behavior in quantum gravity, and connects them to phenomena in string theory, providing a unified framework for understanding their absence.
Findings
Chern-Weil symmetries are conserved due to Bianchi identities.
Quantum gravity prevents exact Chern-Weil global symmetries by breaking or gauging them.
String theory phenomena can be interpreted as consequences of the absence of these symmetries.
Abstract
We draw attention to a class of generalized global symmetries, which we call "Chern-Weil global symmetries," that arise ubiquitously in gauge theories. The Noether currents of these Chern-Weil global symmetries are given by wedge products of gauge field strengths, such as and , and their conservation follows from Bianchi identities. As a result, they are not easy to break. However, it is widely believed that exact global symmetries are not allowed in a consistent theory of quantum gravity. As a result, any Chern-Weil global symmetry in a low-energy effective field theory must be either broken or gauged when the theory is coupled to gravity. In this paper, we explore the processes by which Chern-Weil symmetries may be broken or gauged in effective field theory and string theory. We will see that many familiar phenomena in string theory, such as axions,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
