The Impact of Time Series Length and Discretization on Longitudinal Causal Estimation Methods
Roy Adams, Suchi Saria, Michael Rosenblum

TL;DR
This paper systematically compares the performance of three longitudinal causal estimation methods on long, discretized time series data from health records, highlighting biases and providing practical guidance for analysis.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive comparison of causal estimators on long sequences, identifying sources of bias and guiding discretization choices in health data analysis.
Findings
Discretization can introduce bias in causal estimates.
Longer sequences pose challenges for estimator accuracy.
Practical recommendations improve causal inference in health studies.
Abstract
The use of observational time series data to assess the impact of multi-time point interventions is becoming increasingly common as more health and activity data are collected and digitized via wearables, social media, and electronic health records. Such time series may involve hundreds or thousands of irregularly sampled observations. One common analysis approach is to simplify such time series by first discretizing them into sequences before applying a discrete-time estimation method that adjusts for time-dependent confounding. In certain settings, this discretization results in sequences with many time points; however, the empirical properties of longitudinal causal estimators have not been systematically compared on long sequences. We compare three representative longitudinal causal estimation methods on simulated and real clinical data. Our simulations and analyses assume a Markov…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
