
TL;DR
This paper develops a comprehensive elastic isostasy model using Love numbers, clarifying how planetary topography and gravity anomalies relate to internal stresses and boundary conditions, with implications for planetary structure analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a Love number-based elastic isostasy framework that accounts for internal stresses and boundary conditions, extending classical models and linking elastic and viscous isostasy.
Findings
Elastic isostasy is invariant under shear modulus rescaling.
Long-wavelength isostatic ratios are boundary-condition independent.
Software implementing the model is publicly available.
Abstract
Isostasy explains why observed gravity anomalies are generally much weaker than what is expected from topography alone, and why planetary crusts can support high topography without breaking up. Classical isostasy, however, neglects internal stresses and geoid contributions to topographical support, and yields ambiguous predictions of geoid anomalies. Isostasy should instead be defined either by minimizing deviatoric elastic stresses within the elastic shell, or by studying the dynamic response of the body in the long-time limit. I implement here the first option by formulating Airy isostatic equilibrium as the response of an elastic shell to surface and internal loads. Isostatic ratios are defined in terms of deviatoric Love numbers which quantify deviations with respect to a fluid state. The Love number approach separates the physics of isostasy from the technicalities of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
