Comment on: "Solving many-body Schr\"odinger equations with kinetic energy partition method'', Ann. Phys. 388 (2018) 54-68 by Y-H. Chen and S. D. Chao
Francisco M. Fern\'andez

TL;DR
This paper critiques the kinetic energy partition method by testing it on simple models and questioning the accuracy of previous benchmark comparisons, highlighting potential limitations in the method.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of the kinetic energy partition method's performance using specific quantum models and challenges prior benchmark results.
Findings
Benchmark model is too simple for testing methods
Discrepancies found in eigenvalues cast doubt on KEP accuracy
Most approaches perform better than KEP on tested models
Abstract
We discuss a recent test of the performance of the kinetic energy partition method (KEP) through its application to two separable quantum-mechanical models. We argue that one of the benchmark models is exceedingly simple for testing any realistic approximate method and that almost any reasonable approach yields better results. In the second example our exact benchmark eigenvalues disagree considerably with those chosen by the authors for comparison, which casts doubts on the accuracy of their KEP approach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
